tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2943350273039570808.comments2023-06-25T09:46:30.136+02:00InquiriesMikolkahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06474496860871759825noreply@blogger.comBlogger118125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2943350273039570808.post-54954298434259970162013-06-12T10:12:54.475+02:002013-06-12T10:12:54.475+02:00Merci Marion. Ah, les pompes ! Il y a mille et une...Merci Marion. Ah, les pompes ! Il y a mille et une variation sur les pompes et chacune est un plaisir différent. Surtout quand on la prend comme un exercice de respiration et non comme un exercice de renforcement. C'est comme cela qu'ils se reposent et méditent dans cette position à Moscou, chez Ryabko. Mikolkahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06474496860871759825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2943350273039570808.post-87779938250031344442012-12-21T21:29:38.422+01:002012-12-21T21:29:38.422+01:00ton post expose bien ce qu'est le systema pour...ton post expose bien ce qu'est le systema pour les néophytes comme moi. Pour ma part, j'ai débuté il y a trois semaines et c'est un vrai plaisir! sauf peut-être les fameuses pompes saoudiennes, que j'ai eu l'honneur de découvrir hier :-)marionhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13597340824709525045noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2943350273039570808.post-30583664063632568112012-12-21T21:27:20.628+01:002012-12-21T21:27:20.628+01:00post interressant en tous cas qui fait bien compre...post interressant en tous cas qui fait bien comprendre les principes de base pour des néophytes... pour ma part, j'ai débuté le systema il y a trois semaines à Marseille, et à part les fameuses pompes saoudiennes que j'ai eu l'honneur de découvrir hier, c'est un vrai plaisir :-)marionhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13597340824709525045noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2943350273039570808.post-50386685498151687342012-09-14T10:41:00.125+02:002012-09-14T10:41:00.125+02:00Bonjour Nicolas,
Je ne sais pas si tu auras ce mes...Bonjour Nicolas,<br />Je ne sais pas si tu auras ce message. Je pars en octobre à Londres pour suivre un stage Movnat et j'aurai aimer évoquer la pratique et le paléo-fitness plus largement avec toi. Mathieu (terroir@me.com)Mathieuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15185127334177272118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2943350273039570808.post-83773700209341844242012-03-28T18:22:47.989+02:002012-03-28T18:22:47.989+02:00This comment has been removed by the author.Mutradiowebhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14418800045355761037noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2943350273039570808.post-52370164092949518382012-03-12T09:11:13.336+01:002012-03-12T09:11:13.336+01:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.kaneyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04767722783117979542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2943350273039570808.post-2400500028206686962011-10-24T18:40:33.646+02:002011-10-24T18:40:33.646+02:00Merci. Ces différences sont esquissées dans Born t...Merci. Ces différences sont esquissées dans Born to run et l'auteur renvoie à des études sérieuses (peut-être menées par David Carrier ?).Mikolkahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06474496860871759825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2943350273039570808.post-38734200970776881012011-10-24T15:46:38.355+02:002011-10-24T15:46:38.355+02:00Petites remarques générales :
- Le nom latin d'...Petites remarques générales :<br />- Le nom latin d'une espèce se donne bien en italique, mais avec une majuscule au nom de genre mais pas au nom d'espèce, par exemple : _Homo sapiens_.<br />- L'homme de Neanderthal s'appelle _Homo neanderthalensis_ (terminaison latine correspondant à un lieu d'origine).<br />- australopithecus genus n'existe pas : c'est une mauvaise traduction de l'anglais. "genus" veut dire "genre". "Australopithecus genus" : l'australopithèque, ou le genre _Australopithecus_<br /><br />Pour le reste, j'ai trouvé cet article très intéressant. avez vous des références pour les différences supposées de régulation thermique entre l'homme de Neanderthal et l'homme moderne ?Abiehttp://ceceistuntest.over-blog.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2943350273039570808.post-52895982393304921382011-10-12T16:31:59.578+02:002011-10-12T16:31:59.578+02:00Une personne a laissé une vidéo sur Dailymotion mo...Une personne a laissé une vidéo sur Dailymotion montrant les déchets laissés par les coureurs: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xlfpym_run-in-lyon-2011-objectif-degueulasser-la-ville_news.Mikolkahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06474496860871759825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2943350273039570808.post-89196403651811957752011-10-11T12:51:26.044+02:002011-10-11T12:51:26.044+02:00Hello. As it is is, I haven't watched the vide...Hello. As it is is, I haven't watched the video, but I would very much like to. I've read a considerable amount about 'The First Person', and was especially impressed by the accounts go Kripke's exploration of the metaphysical entities generated and/or implicated in the use of the referential term 'I'.I've been trying to dowload the video of the lecture on several sites, nut to no avail yet.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2943350273039570808.post-32326036429089406502011-09-21T15:19:16.957+02:002011-09-21T15:19:16.957+02:00Merci pour cet article, éclairant et stimulant. J&...Merci pour cet article, éclairant et stimulant. J'en communiquerai l'adresse à mes lycéens.Lottehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03265553703053577128noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2943350273039570808.post-32335403629733251202011-04-05T10:36:11.344+02:002011-04-05T10:36:11.344+02:00Merci Gowitt. Bonne visite !Merci Gowitt. Bonne visite !Mikolkahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06474496860871759825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2943350273039570808.post-84125476073685558422011-03-12T18:16:44.112+01:002011-03-12T18:16:44.112+01:00Bonjour,
Au hasard de recherches sur Weininger, j...Bonjour,<br /><br />Au hasard de recherches sur Weininger, je suis tombé sur votre site. Ce sont très exactement les thèmes que je poursuis. Votre site est en effet construit avec beaucoup de goût et d'exigence. Merci des efforts que vous produisez afin de laisser références et analyses. Cependant je n'ai rien vu des ouvrages de Bouveresse et Chauviré consacrés à Wittegenstein. J'ai apprécié sa biographie par Monk bien qu'elle me paraisse ne pas donner toute l'importance au second Wittgenstein, ni à "de la certitude". Je reviendrai sur votre site.<br />(Rien sur Gödel ?)<br />Merci -GowittGowitthttp://gowitt.over-blog.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2943350273039570808.post-23720347105931894022011-02-01T17:43:33.177+01:002011-02-01T17:43:33.177+01:00Dear Mikolka,
I hope this will be a more helpful ...Dear Mikolka,<br /><br />I hope this will be a more helpful comment than the previous post.<br /><br />I liked your note on the epistemic argument, I found some parts tough going though. In particular, I kept coming back to the thought that we might satisfy our realist intuitions without transgressing epistemic limits.<br /><br />As you point out the intuition is that truths, even the mathematical truths, require truthmakers. <br /><br />The epistemic argument (which I am used to hearing as the "Eleatic principle") is mounted against abstract objects conceived of in an extreme sense; that is, outside space and time. Fair enough.<br /><br />What about truthmakers within space and time? These might also be abstract objects in a sense; they might be relations.<br /><br />A few years ago I was briefly apprenticed at a maintenance site in isolated Pt Hedland. I learnt something there from a craftsman in the art of bricolage. That is, creatively using unlikely, or stand in, materials and tools at hand rather than ideal "bought in" materials.<br /><br />I think some sort of "philosophical bricolage" is required here.<br /><br />If truths of mathematics can be furnished truthmakers within space and time then they it seems these truthmakers will stand in causal or law-like relations to us, and so avert the difficulties of the epistemic argument.<br /><br />Before I forget! This view will still be worthy of the name 'Platonism'. Why order in epistemically expensive transcendent objects when ordinary material objects (and relations between them) might do just as well. No worries that its metaphysical posits rest in the realm below Plato's heaven.<br /><br />Looking forward to your response.<br /><br />Brenton WelfordBrentonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2943350273039570808.post-36644101096082517252010-06-16T15:28:09.101+02:002010-06-16T15:28:09.101+02:00Thank you for your message. And sorry for the dela...Thank you for your message. And sorry for the delay.<br /><br />1) “ After all, one could argue that the objectivity of a thing is determined subjectively-- such a distinction is a mental construct and that subjectivity does exist objectively. “ Indeed, one can ask that question. One can also ask which one is the longer word between “realist” and “nominalist”… OK I am answering seriously now. But I see to much of that kind of strategy in Philosophy : one is asking a direct question and is waiting for an answer to that precise question, when everybody else is trying to avoid a direct answer to that question.<br /><br />2) I am not fond of the subjective/objective distinction. For many reasons that I will not state here because they are irrelevant.<br /><br />3) “Round we go”. Yeah. This is precisely why skepticism is what we call in French an “impasse”, a dead-end, and why I am not a skepticist. Used without extreme delicacy, it is an unweilding theoretical tool.<br /><br />4) What can I say ? I will say : prove it ! We are here talking about mathematical concepts. If somebody, even Pascal or Gödel, says to you : “I believe that the solution of Fermat problem is Z, because I just I had this intuition” are you going to accept Z ? On what ground are you accepting this result ? Is the fact that he just had this intuition a sufficient ground for you ? Well, from my point of view, it is not ! What I mean is that the belief that one has a mathematical "intuition" of an abstract is not an admissible proof to hold that a certain mathematical proposition is true. Here, we are talking about intuition or revelation in general, but intuition in the case of mathematics. Do not make the mistake of mixing problems of intuition in general and problems of mathematical intuition of abstract objects, because the latter is very specific.Mikolkahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06474496860871759825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2943350273039570808.post-14448322940029796662010-05-26T02:07:16.138+02:002010-05-26T02:07:16.138+02:00Hi, Jonathan Speke laudly here,
Seems to me a re...Hi, Jonathan Speke laudly here,<br /> Seems to me a realist vs nominalist distinction---which is a version of the mind/ body, material/ mental split;<br /> Is it a notion or is it a real thing? One could ask, is the real vs notion split==itself a real distinction, a real actual thing or just a notion? Round we go.<br /> This is the context, it seems to me in which you present your argument. I am skeptical of all such distinctions if they are taken as indubitable. After all, one could argue that the objectivity of a thing is determined subjectively-- such a distinction is a mental construct and that subjectivity does exist objectively. <br /> Or one could say that, no, there is an intuition of such a mathematical object, sans concept, that such a mathematical is an independent entity--and that this can be state using concepts. But the reply to this would be that such a claim is just a mental, word, conceptual thing. But the reply to this could be that words are separate from things. But the reply to this is that this too is mental construct. And round we go. <br /> Mental versus physical, real versus imagined, seem to me akin to one claiming one can see that form is entity existing independent of color in the vase-- and another denying--- saying form is just an abstraction and not independently real or material or actual at all. Take your pick. How do you decide such a thing? <br /> Ultimately, if someone says "I have an intuition that there are independent mathematical objects, that, though we cannot touch them, are just as real as any physical object" --or some such.<br /> What can you say? He has such an intuition and you do not. Are you going to deny the existence or validity of his intuition? He will deny your denial and round we go.<br /> And one can argue that there is no clear deviding line between mental and physical even if such a split is presumed.<br /> One could say these are two different points of view of the same thing, or could say they are completely different things altogether ---and tere seems no necessity to label either as entity nor a thought-----just say it is a showing up that receives assent. <br /> Hard for me to agree that a thought is not as real as a taste or a touch. In any case, all this stuff--whether you categorize it as mental or physical or avoid categorization--- --- is the world. What other world do we have? Of what else could the world <br />be formed?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2943350273039570808.post-73093616159515213692009-11-29T10:13:14.315+01:002009-11-29T10:13:14.315+01:00Merci !
LHMerci !<br /><br />LHl harangnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2943350273039570808.post-74563058329871217862009-11-20T04:49:51.064+01:002009-11-20T04:49:51.064+01:00一本道 a片 東京熱成人圖片區.sexdiy影城.米克綜合論壇.85cc免費聊天室.小說論壇甜心寶貝...<a href="http://s628.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">一本道 a片 東京熱成人圖片區</a>.<a href="http://s629.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">sexdiy影城</a>.<a href="http://s630.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">米克綜合論壇</a>.<a href="http://s631.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">85cc免費聊天室</a>.<a href="http://s632.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">小說論壇甜心寶貝貼片</a>.<a href="http://s633.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">視訊交友ing</a>.<a href="http://s634.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">線上aa片免費看av影片</a>.<a href="http://s635.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">youtube 影片g世代論壇</a>.<a href="http://s636.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">080視訊聊天室</a>.<a href="http://s78.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">aaaaa片俱樂部影片</a>.<a href="http://s79.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">一葉晴貼片免費影片線上直播</a>.<a href="http://s80.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">百分百貼影片區成人 視訊</a>.<a href="http://s81.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">85cc免費影片線上觀賞</a>.<a href="http://s82.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">bt成人網</a>.<a href="http://s83.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">85cc免費影片視訊聊天</a>.<a href="http://s84.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">a片免費試看avdvd</a>.<a href="http://s85.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">視訊甜心寶貝av貼片區</a>.<a href="http://s86.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">視訊交友av1688</a>.<a href="http://s87.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">視訊情人後宮電影主入口</a>.<a href="http://s88.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">彩虹馬子免費影片</a>.<a href="http://s89.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">台中酒店S援交</a>.<a href="http://s90.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">後宮電影線上a片免費看</a>.<a href="http://s91.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">洪爺sex免費看a片論壇</a>.<a href="http://s92.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">秘密情人影音視訊網 </a>.<a href="http://s93.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">彩虹日本 avdvd 介紹免費觀賞</a>.<a href="http://s94.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">洪爺主播情人視訊</a>.<a href="http://s95.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">080情人同志交友網</a>.<a href="http://s96.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">18成人avdvd</a>.<a href="http://s97.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">tw33 影片交流</a>.<a href="http://b445.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">bt電影下載aa 片免費看</a>.<a href="http://b446.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">一葉晴貼影片區</a>.<a href="http://b447.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">UT名模視訊交友</a>.<a href="http://b448.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">後官電影主入口</a>.<a href="http://b449.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">av博物館視訊美女</a>.<a href="http://b450.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">免費線上影片bt論壇</a>.<a href="http://b451.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">情色論壇性愛aa 片</a>.<a href="http://b452.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">免費a片卡通</a>.<a href="http://b453.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">真人美女辣妹鋼管秀</a>.<a href="http://b454.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">視訊-美女ggoo</a>.<a href="http://b455.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">洪爺後官電影院</a>.<a href="http://b456.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">免費影片百分百貼影片區</a>.<a href="http://b457.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">百事台南視訊</a>.<a href="http://b458.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">亞洲成人交友</a>.<a href="http://b459.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">免費女優電影 - 18x.us </a>.<a href="http://b460.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">北台灣視訊交友</a>.<a href="http://b461.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">85cc免費a片試看</a>.<a href="http://b462.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">情境坊歡愉用品 </a>.<a href="http://b463.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">辣妹哈啦聊天室 </a>.<a href="http://b464.sexy995.com" rel="nofollow">kk272視訊 </a>.<a href="http://x3377.roro888.com" rel="nofollow">aio辣妺視訊 </a>.<a href="http://x3378.roro888.com" rel="nofollow">辣妹視訊 聊天室</a>.<a href="http://x3379.roro888.com" rel="nofollow">辣妹哈拉視訊聊天室</a>.<a href="http://x3380.roro888.com" rel="nofollow">視訊美女聊天室</a>.<a href="http://x3381.roro888.com" rel="nofollow">免費視訊辣妹愛情公寓</a>.<a href="http://x3382.roro888.com" rel="nofollow">辣妹性愛文學</a>.<a href="http://x3383.roro888.com" rel="nofollow">ut同志交友網</a>.<a href="http://x3384.roro888.com" rel="nofollow">美女短片免費試看</a>.<a href="http://x3385.roro888.com" rel="nofollow">utshow 視訊聊天</a>.<a href="http://x3386.roro888.com" rel="nofollow">youtube 影片,無碼卡通</a>.<a href="http://x3387.roro888.com" rel="nofollow">UT視訊美女交友</a>.<a href="http://x3388.roro888.com" rel="nofollow">微風辣妹論壇短片區</a>.<a href="http://x3389.roro888.com" rel="nofollow">免費av18禁影片</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2943350273039570808.post-6187993574507980272009-10-20T22:33:35.170+02:002009-10-20T22:33:35.170+02:00Thank you for your message.
I am not sure to und...Thank you for your message. <br /><br />I am not sure to understand clearly what you mean. But if you mean that the filming of the reaction of the audience and the framing of the scenes are pathetic, I would say "Indeed !" But the theme of this sandpainting is strongly connected to the life of people who may be in the audience of the show. So it is quite expected that their reactions are emphasized. But by saying this I am not sure I am answering to your remark...Mikolkahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06474496860871759825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2943350273039570808.post-37043503448903830082009-10-20T17:37:35.681+02:002009-10-20T17:37:35.681+02:00Very beautiful but it's too bad the act of pai...Very beautiful but it's too bad the act of painting itself becomes part of a pathetic roleplay meant to stress the drama underlying the picture...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2943350273039570808.post-7836031243929768082009-09-19T18:52:36.916+02:002009-09-19T18:52:36.916+02:00www.explanatorygap.comwww.explanatorygap.comAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2943350273039570808.post-64265350942330249382009-05-11T13:30:00.000+02:002009-05-11T13:30:00.000+02:00JD: de rien et avec plaisir !
CE: Qu'il est modes...JD: de rien et avec plaisir !<br /><br />CE: Qu'il est modeste notre Cédric. Je lui proposais d'être le héros du jour et il se hisse à un niveau supérieur d'héroïcité en refusant mon offre !<br /><br />Mais c'est exact. Julien D. possédait les archives de Philotropes I jusqu'à sa dernière sauvegarde (2/03/2009). Et Cédric lui a permis de retrouver les comentaires et les posts postérieurs à cette date. Modification prise en compte.Mikolkahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06474496860871759825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2943350273039570808.post-33479846868184366482009-05-11T12:31:00.000+02:002009-05-11T12:31:00.000+02:00Salut !
« Thanks to Cédric Eyssette, Philotropes I...Salut !<br />« Thanks to Cédric Eyssette, Philotropes I has been restored. »<br />En fait, ce n'est pas grâce à moi. Julien a certainement simplement restauré Philotropes à partir des archives dont il dispose. Je lui proposais simplement une manip pour les posts et commentaires manquants.<br />Bye,<br />CédricCédric Eyssettehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03554729151366987781noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2943350273039570808.post-50310177111783451422009-05-10T23:26:00.000+02:002009-05-10T23:26:00.000+02:00Merci!Merci!Julien Dutanthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13680336694944643913noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2943350273039570808.post-1913908446542839182009-03-14T18:33:00.000+01:002009-03-14T18:33:00.000+01:00Cher Anonyme,Tout d'abord, je vous remercie pour v...Cher Anonyme,<BR/><BR/>Tout d'abord, je vous remercie pour votre commentaire. <BR/><BR/>1) Une distinction pour commencer. L'exposé de F Dastur n'est pas une exégèse ou un commentaire sur le livre de Gadamer, mais un essai philosophique qui s'appuie sur le livre de Gadamer en question. Et l'exposé de F. Dastur, me semble-t-il présentait assez clairement l'aspect que j'ai présenté.<BR/><BR/><BR/>2) En ce qui concerne le manque de précision de Dastur sur l'état du rapport entre la biologie et la médecine, je dirais qu'il ne faut pas être la dupe de ce genre de pratique. En argumentation, ce genre de procédé porte un nom, il s'appelle "strawman" ou "homme de paille": il consiste à construire de toutes pièces une image de son adversaire beaucoup plus facile à réfuter que la position réelle de son adversaire. <BR/><BR/>Qu'est-ce que le positivisme caricatural que F. Dastur nous a présenté? L'homme de paille d'une relation beaucoup plus complexe entre la biologie et la médecine. Croyant réfuter ce positivisme caricatural (on ne voit pas très bien comment, par ailleurs), elle croit réfuter tout fondement biologique de la médecine. <BR/><BR/>En ne disant rien sur l'état actuel de la médecine, elle croit donner plus d'efficacité à son argument. Mais cela ne fait que renforcer l'aspect fallacieux de son argument.<BR/><BR/>Et pour terminer sur cette question, bien que je ne dise rien sur cette question dans le billet, son exposé était parsemé de remarques (très négatives) sur l'état actuel des relations entre la biologie et la médecine. Toutes ses suggestions sur la psychiatrie étaient clairement opposées à sa dimension physiologique. Si on l'avait poussée un peu, je suis certain qu'on aurait trouvé le discours habituel contre les traitements médicamenteux. <BR/><BR/><BR/>3) Qu'il y ait une distinction entre la philosophie et la science, c'est une chose qui peut être discutée. La discussion sera sans doute très intéressante. <BR/><BR/>Mais qu'on adopte une attitude anti-scientifique systématique, en critiquant toute tentative scientifique rationnelle sous le prétexte -ridicule- selon lequel toute science est scientiste, tout d'abord cela m'irrite, et ensuite cela n'a aucun fondement philosophique, rationnel, historique, factuel... Et moralement, je ne peux pas m'empêcher d'y voir la mauvaise foi de nos prétendus "intellectuels". <BR/><BR/>Amicalement,Mikolkahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06474496860871759825noreply@blogger.com